01 / SOURCE LOCK
Know the exact records
Each source is identified, retained by fetch instance, hashed, dated, and paired with a canonical content check where available.
Fixed-price pilot for US boutique patent-prosecution firms
See exactly what changed between two public claim versions. Then let counsel decide what it means.
PatentClaims converts two identified public USPTO claim-bearing records from the same application into a provenance-preserving change packet: source locks, claim inventory, candidate lineage, word-level redlines, exceptions, and an attorney approval worksheet.
$750 prepaid
10 business days
Up to 15 public US applications
150 claims maximum
PatentClaims is not a law firm, provides no legal advice, and does not create an attorney-client relationship with the operator.
Commercial status: No pilot has been sold or delivered. This is one identical validation offer for a locked 20-firm cohort; the $750 price is a test, not validated willingness to pay.
The bounded job
A review packet for claim changes—not a legal conclusion.
The pilot reduces re-keying and makes the evidence trail explicit. It does not interpret claim scope, determine legal effect, or replace the firm’s own review.
02 / CHANGE PACKET
See the text operations
Claim inventories, normalized hashes, candidate lineage, word-level redlines, and an exception queue keep changes inspectable.
03 / REVIEW GATE
Keep counsel in control
Every observation starts unapproved. A named customer attorney must approve, correct, or reject it before any internal release.
Public-source demonstration
One application. Two official records. A reproducible change queue.
This bounded demonstration uses official public USPTO records for US 16/514,774. It is not customer work and not a customer result.
DEMO-16514774-20260807-v2 · public-source facts + synthetic workflow labels
UNAPPROVED — ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED
Claim Version Control Report
20 claims → 12 claims
net delta −8
OBS-001 · claim-set count
Review state: UNAPPROVED. Machine observation: the identified public records contain 20 and 12 claims. Attorney action: confirm the source inventory. This count does not establish scope, validity, patentability, enforceability, status, or legal effect.
OBS-002 · added text in later claim 1 record
Review state: UNAPPROVED. Machine observation: the later independent-claim record contains an additional terminal limitation block. Attorney action: verify the source images and approve, correct, or reject it. The observation does not determine scope, materiality, strategy, or legal effect.
OBS-003 · lineage candidate
Review state: UNAPPROVED. A published dependent-claim limitation matches a terminal block in the issued claim 1 record under the stated normalization rules. The workflow label does not establish applicant intent, examiner reasoning, scope, or legal effect.
Evidence boundary
The demo establishes that the bounded source-lock, comparison, and review workflow can be reproduced on these selected public records. It does not establish legal accuracy, customer demand, delivery speed, savings, outcomes, production integrations, or suitability for any live matter.
One offer · fixed before outreach
Claim Version Control Pilot
$750
Prepaid. One firm. 10 business days from signed source lock.
Locked pilot scope
- Up to 15 public US applications
- Exactly two identified claim-bearing versions per application
- 30 source documents maximum and 150 claims total
- Source register, claim inventory, deterministic hashes, candidate lineage, redlines, exceptions, approval worksheet, and correction log
- Changed independent claims and exceptions manually checked against source images
- Internal attorney-review packet; no external or client distribution included
Good fit
- US boutique patent-prosecution firm with 2–20 attorneys
- Named partner or senior patent paralegal owns the decision
- A US-licensed patent attorney is assigned to review
- Exactly two identified public claim-bearing records per matter
- Firm accepts an unapproved packet until attorney sign-off
Not included
- Legal advice, claim construction, legal scope, status, or outcome opinions
- Patentability, validity, enforceability, infringement, FTO, or clearance analysis
- Drafting, amendment language, prosecution strategy, filing, docketing, or deadline calculation
- Non-public, privileged, sealed, export-controlled, or confidential matter content
- Customer credentials, write access, system integrations, or automated external distribution
Delivery controls
A reviewable chain from source to approval.
Qualify and lock
Confirm public-source eligibility, the named buyer and attorney reviewer, the exact matter cohort, two source versions per matter, and the signed evidence disposition date.
Extract and reconcile
Retain exact source bytes, record fetch identity and content checks, reconcile claim counts to source images, normalize deterministically, and queue uncertainty rather than hiding it.
Compare and verify
Generate candidate lineage and token redlines. Human-check every changed independent claim and every exception against the selected source images.
Attorney decides
Deliver an internal unapproved packet. The named customer attorney approves, corrects, or rejects each observation. Corrections create a new version; approved reports are never silently edited.
Questions before a fit call
The important boundaries, upfront.
Is PatentClaims a law firm or a legal-opinion service?
No. PatentClaims prepares text and version-comparison work product for review by the customer’s own US patent counsel. It does not provide legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship with the operator.
What records can the pilot use?
Only identified public US claim-bearing records. No unpublished applications, non-public Patent Center material, privileged or confidential files, client credentials, draft claims, invention disclosures, or internal legal notes.
What if a source or extraction is uncertain?
The matter remains in the locked cohort and is returned as source-blocked or review-required. It is not silently repaired or replaced after results are known.
Can the packet be sent to clients automatically?
No. The pilot is offline and read-only relative to customer systems. Unapproved observations cannot be used in external/client exports, alerts, filings, CRM notes, or downstream automation.
How are working files retained?
Temporary processing copies are deleted no later than 30 days after the final attorney decision or pilot termination, whichever is earlier. The signed source manifest fixes a finite disposition date for immutable evidence before source lock, with documented legal or dispute holds handled separately.
Request the fixed pilot terms
If your firm fits the boundary, start with a safe qualification.
No payment is taken on this page. The public form has been intentionally withheld until its rate limiting, durable deduplication, privacy notice, and confirmed-success handling are production-verified. Matched firms receive the same written $750 prepaid terms only after fit and source eligibility are confirmed.
- Send your firm name and business role.
- Confirm the firm has 2–20 attorneys and a named US patent attorney reviewer.
- Confirm only that up to 15 public US applications with two public claim-bearing records can be identified later under signed terms.
Do not send claim text, unpublished applications, credentials, or client-confidential material. Do not include application numbers or client names. Matter identifiers and handling terms are agreed through the signed source manifest—not the first email.
Request pilot terms by email
The locked 20-firm demand cohort is operated separately from organic inquiries. Public inquiries, page views, supportive replies, and clicks do not count as offers, proposals, or payments. Cohort outreach remains gated on independent US patent-counsel review of the standard disclaimer and pilot terms.